The History of The Pledge of Allegiance in the United States

76

By Chef Jeff

Norman Rockwell's The Pledge of Allegiance
Norman Rockwell's The Pledge of Allegiance

The United States Pledge of Allegiance

Having taught students from other nations, and having visited other countries, I know that the idea of a Pledge of Allegiance in not peculiar to the U.S. But in the U.S. many of us do not know the long and changing history of our own Pledge of Allegiance.

Over at least 20 years now I have been hearing from some groups that the Pledge in under attack by "godless atheists" (a redundancy in terms, since atheists do not believe in God). I have heard also that "In God We Trust" is under pernicious attack by these same "Ultra Liberal - Communist inspired traitors" who want to finish the job of taking God and religion out of the public school system.

Indeed, many of these allegations are even now spread all over the Internet as if they were brand-new reporting on some nefarious plot by the ultra-Left to put the last nail in the coffin of a "God-fearing America."

As a public school teacher I can remember only one day when we did not say our Pledge of Allegiance in individual classrooms. That day was September 12th, 2001, when all our classes joined in the high school auditorium to recite the pledge in unison, from Pre-K to 12th grade, with tears in our eyes and a lump in our throats. My son and a good friend played "echo-taps" where one trumpeter plays the first round of taps and a brief moment later a second, muted "echo" is played by the second trumpeter. It is a very moving thing to witness.

Freedom From Religion vs. The Pledge of Allegiance

I won't argue that the changes to the pledge of Allegiance haven't caused controversy during its history. Francis Bellamy, creator of the pledge. protested the changes to his original wording. Just why he did not like the changes are, to my knowledge, not recorded. He may have liked the simplicity of the wording, and perhaps he believed that lengthening it added to much to what his original idea actually expressed. We don't know, however, and so must be left guessing at his motives.

When he originally wrote the pledge, however, there were still many hard feelings, especially in the Southern states of the old Confederacy, over The War Between the States, also known as The Civil War. Healing was still going on at that late date, thus, I believe the word "indivisible" was important to him. The question of ever again dividing the Union had seemingly been put to rest after April, 1865, but even in our own times were have seen the symbols of Confederate heritage and history come back into vogue. Whether the Confederate battle flag used in some states as part of their state flags fosters an old hatred or is merely a question of heritage is beyond this particular hub. Just the same, the South was suffering in the 1880's and the question of it all being resolved in 1865 were again coming to the forefront of political movements in the South.

The KKK was still fighting the segregationist battles of Post-reconstruction, and this was a time before the KKK grabbed the U.S. flag and Christianity as themes to include people outside the south and "The Cause" into its ranks. In time, they would become an ultra-patriotic sounding organization, with hundreds of thousands of members, mostly united around the racial ideas of "White America" fighting the "sub-Human Jews and Blacks and Catholics" it saw as the "natural enemies of the White Race." But those battles were to be fought in the future, and in 1888 the battle was over the south's (arguably legitimate) anger over the post-reconstruction era, when the South suffered greatly both economically and in the lack of federal government aid to all its people, black and white alike.

With Bellamy's socialist Baptist background, and being from Boston, the heart of the abolitionist movement of the 1850's and 1860's, it was only natural that he create a pledge that fostered the ideas of his background against inequality, racism and the other social ills he saw in American society of the time.

Thus his desire, but inability, to get the word "equality" into his original Pledge of Allegiance.

And today, in public schools all across the nation, the Pledge of Allegiance is recited every school day-morning as follows: "I pledge Allegiance, to the flag, of the United States of America, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all."

We do not include the ideals of "Liberty (equality) and justice for all", and many of us celebrate the inclusion of "under God". So has the original intent of the Pledge of Allegiance been changed, and if so, were these changes created to meet the challenges of a new era?

I am not specifically qualified to answer in anything other than to state, in my own humble opinion, that the answer is yes to both questions. Our pledge of Allegiance should be altered to include the word "equality" where its creator Francis Bellamy desired it should be placed, and the nature of the Pledge was indeed altered to reflect the changes of the times in America. The 1950's have often been viewed through the lens of nostalgia, whereby we were somehow a more pure nation, where everybody lived in perfect harmony and things were somehow, just right.

I suppose that, being a Caucasian who was born in those times, I could see how one segment of the nation might think that way. But where I lived we were in daily contact with people who were not "Free, White and 21" as the old saying goes. I saw plenty of injustice, plenty of inequality, and plenty of God-fearing people acting wrongly towards those of other races, creeds and ethnic backgrounds.

Unfortunately, I see the same things happening today, so I have to question those who deem that we are indeed a "one nation under God", why do these hatreds, which are most ungodly in origin and practice, still exist?

I guess I have to ask of those who really want the Pledge of Allegiance to be a part of our everyday school childrens' lives, do you truly live the Godly lives you support as expressed by the pledge, or do you believe that just by saying it, you cover all the ills we as a nation otherwise ignore? Is your anger against those who do not see the appropriateness of those two words "under God" just a knee-jerk reaction against those you see wanting to take religion out of our lives, or do you believe and act upon your beliefs to make American live up to its own Pledge of Allegiance, in word, action and thought??

I guess I am asking also - is there really a threat by godless atheists against the words "under God" in our Pledge of Allegiance, or is this just a rumor that has got out of hand? If, after all, I have been hearing about this alleged threat for more than 20 years, and yet I have yet to see any serious threat materialize, how am I to take it seriously? where is the threat, and by whom is it being made manifest?

The Changes to the Pledge

In 1923 and 1924 the National flag Conference decided to change the words "my Flag" to "the Flag of the United States of America", a change which Bellamy protested to no avail. Under the auspices of the Daughters of the American Revolution, his protests fell upon deaf ears.

In 1954 the Knights of Columbus mounted a campaign to add the words "under God" to the pledge, and the Congress, with President Eisenhower's strong support, officially acted to include the two new words, thus giving a nuance to the pledge which it lacked before. The change was generally welcomed, mostly because of the Cold War atmosphere of the time, when the United States was seen by many as not only the bastion of freedom against the Soviet Union, itself a godless power, but also a nation of God fighting the evil forces of Communism. This was the prevailing thought at the time, and was supported by many citizens of the United States.

Over time, however, some people began to question if by including the words "under God" gave the pledge a religious overtone that might be in conflict with the idea of separation of church and state. A few people argued for the exclusion of organized religious activities in public school, and since the pledge had long been established as a morning routine in most public schools across the nation, it became a focal point of those seeking to create the idea of freedom from religion in the U.S.

The Beginning of the Pledge of Allegience

So how did this interesting pledge begin, and what were the major reasons it was necessary to create it?

Source for the following information: The Pledge of Allegiance, A Short History by: Dr. John W. Bear, copyright 1992.

It may surprise many of us that the original Pledge of Allegiance was created in 1892 by Francis Bellamy, a Christian Socialist and Baptist minister. Francis used the ideas of his socialist first cousin and author Edwin Bellamy, who wrote such stirring left-wing Utopian books as Looking Backward (1888) and (1897).

Francis Bellamy was pressured to leave his Boston church because of his socialist views, but he had made a good friend in Daniel Ford, owner and editor of The Youth's Companion, a leading popular book of its day. Ford also later founded the controversial and quite Liberal Ford Hall Forum for like-thinking citizens.

Bellamy's first publication of the Pledge of Allegiance is as follows: "I pledge allegiance to my Flag and (to*) the Republic for which it stands, one nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all." (* the word 'to' was added in 1892.)

Bellamy had wanted to include the word "equality" to the pledge but he knew that the superintendents of education and also many other people in those days were strongly opposed equality for women and African Americans.

Proponents such as the illustrious Dr. Mortimer Alder of St, John's College argued that without equality, the rest of the ideals were not as effective. He said that three great points needed to be vowed in the pledge: liberty, equality and justice for all. He believed that justice was necessary to mediate between the often conflicting ideas and goals of "liberty" and "equality."

Yet thus the Pledge of Allegiance was to be known to several generations of Americas until some changes were made in the approaching middle years of the first half of the 20th century.

Bellamy's Ideas for Why He Created The Pledge of Allegiance

I quote directly from Dr. Bear's treatis on The Pledge of Allegiance, A Short History (http://history.vineyard.net/pledge.htm)

"Bellamy's granddaughter said he also would have resented this second change.(1954) He had been pressured into leaving his church in 1891 because of his socialist sermons. In his retirement in Florida, he stopped attending church because he disliked the racial bigotry he found there.

What follows is Bellamy's own account of some of the thoughts that went through his mind in August, 1892, as he picked the words of his Pledge:

It began as an intensive communing with salient points of our national history, from the Declaration of Independence onwards; with the makings of the Constitution...with the meaning of the Civil War; with the aspiration of the people...

The true reason for allegiance to the Flag is the 'republic for which it stands.' ...And what does that vast thing, the Republic mean? It is the concise political word for the Nation - the One Nation which the Civil War was fought to prove. To make that One Nation idea clear, we must specify that it is indivisible, as Webster and Lincoln used to repeat in their great speeches. And its future?

Just here arose the temptation of the historic slogan of the French Revolution which meant so much to Jefferson and his friends, 'Liberty, equality, fraternity.' No, that would be too fanciful, too many thousands of years off in realization. But we as a nation do stand square on the doctrine of liberty and justice for all..."

Change for a new era?

Is it right to change an accepted work of art or writing for the sake of current political expediency?
Is it right to change an accepted work of art or writing for the sake of current political expediency?

Do you support The Pledge of Allegiance as it is now recited?

  • Yes
  • No
  • No Opinion
See results without voting

Comments

Storytellersrus profile image

Storytellersrus Level 7 Commenter 3 years ago

Hey Chef Jeff! Mind if I play with this one a bit? I am in a playful mood...

I find it interesting that atheists claim they don't believe in God. Logically, they must define God in order to reject God, which means they recognize God's existence. I think agnostics are the ones who truly don't believe. They are apathetic; in my understanding, apathy exists in a void where God has no definition.

Still, YHWH was once "He who must not be named." In this case, God did exist in the void and beyond the void.

Anyway, God probably doesn't stress about it. God knows whether or not God exists. And if God is everything, whenever people believe in something, they are believing in God...

As Eckhert Tolle says, this too will pass.

hootnhowell profile image

hootnhowell 3 years ago

I do not object if a silly SOB wishes to disbelieve what is all around him. What I object to is his telling me I can't choose to believe what is all around me. If this person wishes to have his/her child attend school without the benifit of prayer. Then the burden for the cost should fall upon them such as a private school. I tend to believe that today more than ever God is needed in the school. Now more than ever we need God on our money! Now more than ever we all need God in our hearts and minds. To for even one nano second believe that a law passed by a corrupt organization such as the ACLU will keep God from our school. Then you my friends don't know my God! I would venture a guess that in the final moments of life not one person begs for a second chance from the ACLU. I would further bet most all send this prayer to none other than God. Serve who you will, As for me and my house we shall worship the lord!

robie2 profile image

robie2 Level 6 Commenter 3 years ago

Hi chef and thanks for this very interesting historical view of the Pledge. I remember learning it in kindergarten and for the longest time thinking that "indivisible" was "invisible" and wondering why we had to say our nation was invisible LOL Also, I learned the pledge before the "under God" was put into it so I always stumble over that now--never know where to stick it in.

It is so interesting to see how people re-write facts to suit their own POV, isn't it? Some people think the "under God" part was always there. It wasn't -- I found the part about equality being left out and replaced by liberty and justice fascinating too. Will we ever achieve any of those things I wonder?

ColdWarBaby 3 years ago

Very informative as usual Chef.  However, I must chastise you just this once.  Stop referring to "other races".  You know there are none!

I stopped reciting the pledge while in junior high (that's what they called middle school back then).  I had already come to the conclusion that both nationalism and religious fundamentalism were psychopathological.

Chef Jeff profile image

Chef Jeff Hub Author 3 years ago

Hey, storytellersrus, feel free to play with this a much as you please. Personally I have nothing against the changes made to the Pledge of Allegiance, and while I can see how some people might, it is their choice to recite it or not. I never forced a student to recite it, but neither did I point out any student who decided not to.

As for prayer in public schools, I doubt we are going to see that happen anytime soon. The social conservatives have had the Congress, President and Supreme Court on their side over this issue for several years (up to Nov 2006, anyway) and they didn't do anyhting to try to change things along that tline. They also didn't do anything to overturn Roe vs. Wade, even when they had the majorities in those three branches of the government.

And as anyone who knows me will understand, I really think that prayer has never been completely banned from public schools. Individuals can and do pray in school all the time. When I was teaching groups of Christian students would meet and stand in prayer at the flag ploe of the school. and no one did anything to hinder them.

In Illinois we even have a moment of silent reflection meant for those who wish to either prayer or reflect on life. It was only the school-organized leading of prayer, following any one religious organization's idea or dogma, that was, in my understanding, banned. And this was done because, let's face it, not everyone who says he or she is a Christian prays and observes prayer the same way.

I doubt most Protestants would be completely comfortable with a Catholic prayer lead in a public school, and vice versa. A Mormon may not appreciate a Baptist prayer, and a Jehovah's Witness may not appreciate an Evangelical prayer. An Evangelical Protestant might not like praying to the Virgin mary to intercede, or think that the Rosary was really a prayer for his or her children to recite, while Catholics may claim that any prayer which did not include these things was not really a prayer at all.

Do we really want school boards and teachers to spend precious educational, academic time getting into these kinds of arguments?

Plus, people are perfectly free to attend the church and/or school of their choice. They can also home school if they believe the public schools do not meet their test of Godliness in their childrend' education. I have many friends who homeschool for just this very reason.

God never left the hearts of those who are faithful to their beliefs in God, even if the Supreme Court has decided that organized prayer threatens the freedom of religion much more than it protects it.

I know some people may disagree with me, and apparently someone decided to keep clicking the negative button on this hub, which yesterday brought its rating down to 18. Just as a matter of respect, I always press the positive rating button, even if I do not agree with the content or material covered by the hub. If I find myself tempted to click the negative button, I just exit the hub and don't return.

I can also say that except for the "Sexy Babes of Outer Slombovia" type hubs, I never ignore any hub, even if I do not agree with the author. I have respect for all hubbers who put their beliefs and passion into their writing, and I love to read all sides of an issue.

Anyway, thanks for your comment and I always look forward to your insightful thoughts and ideas!

Chef Jeff profile image

Chef Jeff Hub Author 3 years ago

Hello, hootnhowell, thanks for commenting!  I understand from the many emails I get every week that the ACLU is hated by many people of faith, but I am still wondering where and when these threats are or have occurred?  I realize that the Supreme Court created a situation whereby organized prayer in public schools was found to be unconstitutional, and I know that many of my friends who object to that have been upset over the decades with the finding.

However, I still receive these eamils telling me that Madalyn Murray O'Hair(*) is attemting to get In God We Trust and TV shows like Touched By An Angel taken away, but she's been dead since 1995.  So, I don't think she can be the cause of these stories.

I am going to ask you, please, to write either a comment here or a hub about just who these people are and what they are trying to do, because frankly, I find no evidence at all that there is any organized, serious effort to remove In God We Trust from our currency, or to remove the words "under God" from the Pledge of Allegiance.

So please let me know because I really think right now that no one has been able to prove to me, at least, that this rumor is true.

And again, thanks for your comment!

(*)Madalyn Murray O'Hair's son became a Christian in 1980, so he is not behind this, either, even though some emails have told me that he was.

Chef Jeff profile image

Chef Jeff Hub Author 3 years ago

ColdWar baby, touche!  You are correct and I forgot that point.  I guess it's the pain meds that are making me crazy!

Anyway, yes I recognize that race is an artificial term.  Just the same, so much of the hate literature uses that word, and variations of it, to define what they hate about "other people".

By the way, I also do not mean to give the idea that I in any way agree with the racist dribble I had to quote in my hub, for I reject it with all fervor.  However, I have known some of the people who wrap themselves (falsely, I find) in the mantle of flag, country and religion while they spew hatred of anyone who is either not like them or who disagrees with them.

I guess i still wonder just how a person who belongs to the KKK, Posse Comatatus or American National Socialist White People's Party can believe in God while spouting hatred of other God-loving people, can claim patriotism while hoisting either a Nazi flag or any other of any defunct power that once fought against the U.S. flag, or can claim to be someone who loves this nation while at the same time planning to overthrow it by violence and deadly force.

ColdWarBaby 3 years ago

Chef, I know it was an oversight. I was simply bustin your chops.

Good questions in your last paragraph above. But, hey, those kinds of folks don't have to answer to anyone. They got god on their side! Or so they seem to believe.

Chef Jeff profile image

Chef Jeff Hub Author 3 years ago

I know, CWB, and I was laughing at myself as I reread what I wrote and realized you were right on the mark!

Anyway, have a great Labor Day, even if it is supposed to be held on May 1st, but was changed so we don't appear to be one of those "Socialist Countries" we heard about in the past!

Believe me, there is very little anyone can say to me that I take offense with - I used to be a hothead but that icepack I had attached to my brain seems to have cooled me down so I laugh a lot more these days! LOL!!!

Dottie1 profile image

Dottie1 3 years ago

Thanks Chef Jeff for this bit of history and the changes that were made to the pledge of allegience. I cannot help but think of my first grade teacher whenever I hear or recite the pledge of allegience, remembering how passionate, tall and still she stood when saluting our flag. She made quite an impression on me many many many years ago. And BTW I just loved the Porky Pig video you picked out. Thanks.

Chef Jeff profile image

Chef Jeff Hub Author 3 years ago

Hey, Dottie1 - thanks for the comment!  I remember that Porky Pig video as a movie when I was in Kindergarten.  The teacher showed it to us as a movie and it made an impression, as you can see!  I was in Kindergarten more than half-a-century ago!

It took a few years for the schools to start using the two new words "under God" in the pledge, so I was actually just starting in, I believe, 2nd, grade when I noticed the change. that would have been about 1958????

Also, don't forget to vote!

Valentine Logar profile image

Valentine Logar Level 2 Commenter 3 years ago

Thank you for the link to this one. Great historical review of both the Pledge itself and the original author. I have written something similar on another site, but I must say nowhere near as in-dept.

Not hard to believe that you were a Teacher in a previous life. Marvelous.

prasadjain profile image

prasadjain Level 4 Commenter 3 years ago

Very objective, passionless hub. Your love for objectivity deserves every appreciation.

Dr. Terrence Ward 17 months ago

In the spring of January 1959 William Murray literally drags Madalyn Murray O'Hair into a political fight she would win in his name because he wanted to display his self-discovery of Atheism in the public arena by fighting against mandatory Bible recitation and school prayer; though, in later years in adult life William Murray would repudiate his mother and Atheism.

Publishing or co-authoring “Mommie Dearest’s” literary genres in a backlash attempt to character assassinate Madalyn Murray O’Hair! William Murray, quite the contrary, is searching for the secrets of Atheism.

He demanded his mother teach him about Atheism and would often on numerous occasions label her a hypocrite because he wasn’t certain of his mothers’ convictions in Atheism...or how she refused to reveal instructions or information about Atheist day-to-day activites.

William Murray, at the tender age of 14, demanded Madalyn Murray O’Hair do the following in his name because he was certain school administrators wouldn’t take him seriously:

“If I say anything to the teacher, she is in such a low echelon that it will be completely a lost ball in the ball game. I’ve decided that you have to take the ball here and carry it for the first couple of days. Yes, I’ve decided! I want to tell you what I want you to do. Tomorrow morning early, you call the school and tell them that I’m not going to say prayers or read the Bible anymore. If I tell them, they’ll think I’m a fourteen year old brat. I’d get nowhere. Now, you tell them that I will not pray, and see what they are going to say.” [O’Hair, M. Madalyn. “An Atheist Epic: The Complete Unexpurgated Story of How Bible and Prayers Were Removed from the Public Schools of the United States ”. American Atheist Press; 2nd Edition, October 1st 1989]

Kathleen 16 months ago

I really enjoyed reading this. The irony of the conservatives wanting all of the little children across America to be reciting the words of a Socialist, who had some serious issues with religion. I'm wondering if President Obama says the pledge will that confirm that he's a Socialist?

Stump Parrish profile image

Stump Parrish Level 2 Commenter 11 months ago

Chef, nice detailed history of the pledge and the only thing I noticed that was missing was the stiff armed (nazi style) salute that was originally part of the pledge.

http://rexcurry.net/pledge_military.html

Phillip Crown 2 months ago

One correction to your history of the pledge. It was not Congres that inserted "under God" but Eishenhower almost immediately after becoming President. However,several years earlier Congress, because there were different versions of the pledge, had passed a law establishing what the pledge should be. The court told Eisenhower that he could not change the law and he then asked Congress to pass a new law contining the phrase "under God". In 1953 I was in the eighth grade and we were struggling to add the phrase, trying to remember where Eishenhower had placed it. Congress didn't pass the new law containing the phrase until the next year, but we were already saying (or trying to) Feb to May, 1953. Why is this fact always left out of the history of the pledge? By the way I will no longer say the pledge because of that phrase. It doesn't belong in this melting pot nation. Neither does "in God we trust" belong on our money. It would be more correct to saY "in greed we trust". I am a retired minister of the Church of Christ. But there is separation of church and state in the Constitution and what the right wing is trying to

do to this country is totaly wrong. It is Fascism, not Christianity.

Submit a Comment
Members and Guests

Sign in or sign up and post using a hubpages account.



    • No HTML is allowed in comments, but URLs will be hyperlinked
    • Comments are not for promoting your Hubs or other sites

    The Pledge of Allegiance
    Amazon Price: $1.46
    List Price: $5.99
    The Pledge of Allegiance
    Amazon Price: $0.00
    Teacher Created Resources Pledge of Allegiance Chart, Multi Color (7631)
    Amazon Price: $1.00
    List Price: $1.99
    I Pledge Allegiance Big Book
    Amazon Price: $15.92
    List Price: $24.99
    The Pledge of Allegiance
    Amazon Price: $0.99
    The Pledge of Allegiance (American Symbols)
    Amazon Price: $2.49
    List Price: $8.95
    Pledge of Allegiance Tour: Live Recording
    Amazon Price: $0.33
    List Price: $11.98
    The Pledge of Allegiance (Welcome Books: American Symbols)
    Amazon Price: $1.52
    List Price: $4.95
    Please wait working